Reginald Black

Feb 20, 2017

I can\'t say enough about Kathleen Gingrich. I needed her services at a very difficult time in my life. She was always available and really listened to me and ...

Deb Hoffert

Feb 08, 2017

I can not say enough great things about this law firm. Everyone is extremely knowledgeable, professional and above all else very friendly. I have never had an issue personally or ...

John Arena

Feb 01, 2017

Peter Russo and the staff at his firm have handled my personal and professional business for almost a decade. His office is extremely professional and efficient. They never forget that ...

rick scott

Feb 01, 2017

Peter was easy to work with and handled my case first class. He was knowledgeable about my case (possible age discrimination) and gave me options on what I could do. ...

Jenn Spears Brenize

Feb 01, 2017

Peter is extremely knowledgeable and aggressive, yet even-tempered. He is professional, diligent, and compassionate, and responsive to his clients\' needs. I never hesitate to send him a referral as ...

Robert Davis

Jul 25, 2018

WERE BACK !! First and foremost Peter has a sense of humor. Peter was efficient and effective and on point when it came to the time line of events. Very important ...

Angela Reighard

Jun 26, 2018

Kara Haggerty was an amazing attorney. She handled my highly toxic divorce with aplomb, carefully and skillfully. Megan was also very helpful. Highly recommend!!

Bob Levin

May 11, 2018

I have been working with Peter for last 3 years and the experience has been worthwhile. He is a man of his word and I would highly recommend him.

Beth Sizer

Mar 22, 2018

I am a grandmother who just wants to be involved with her only grandson\'s life in every way, watch him grow and always be there for him and just ...

Aubrey

Jan 10, 2018

Peter is an excellent attorney! He is caring and effective in his representations.

Review By:
Reviews

Many Pennsylvania families have pets that they consider members of their family. This can create a difficult situation during a divorce. While people may consider their pets to be like their children, pets are treated like other property in the property division process.

More couples today choose not to have children than couples only a generation or two ago. Because of this, many couples view their pets as their companions or their children. In addition, people today are expected to spend around $41 billion on pets this year, which is $24 billion more than what was spent in 1994. All these factors play a role in the increase in custody disputes over animals in a divorce. In fact, a survey conducted by the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers found that a quarter of respondents had seen an increase in cases involving pet custody.

Despite the issues many couples have regarding their pets, a 1995 court case in Florida may show how some courts view the issue. The case, heard by the 1st District Court of Appeals in Florida, ruled against a woman who was asking the court to enforce a lower court’s ruling that said she had visitation rights to her ex-husband’s dog. The court claimed that, because the dog was personal property, her right to visit the dog never existed.

In many cases, one spouse may be in a better position to keep the animal than the other spouse. For example, if one parent has custody of the children or cared for the pet more during the marriage, that person may be more likely to retain ownership of the animal. However, disputes regarding custody and property division may be difficult depending on the circumstances of the divorce. A lawyer working with a client may be able to help a couple reach an equitable resolution during divorce proceedings.

Source: The Huffington Post, “Who Gets The Pets In A Divorce? What You Need To Consider When Fighting Over Fido“, Maria Moya, January 19, 2014